Saturday, October 25, 2014

Providential moments that catch you by surprise

• Wanting to make a difference.  

A biomedical researcher, Jennifer Doudna, and her colleagues at the University of California, Berkeley were engaged in rather basic science and were just trying to figure out how bacteria fight the flu. Then they made a discovery that caught them by surprise. They observed that bacteria have special enzymes that can cut open the DNA of an invading virus and make a change in the DNA at the site of the cut — essentially killing the virus.

As Doudna was studying a group of these enzymes, it finally dawned on her: the enzymes had what amounted to a short template inside that could attach to a specific string of letters in the viral DNA. What if she could change the template so that it could recognize any DNA sequence, not just the sequences in viruses? She said, “I thought, wow, if this could work in animal or plant cells, this could be a very, very useful and very powerful tool” for human use.

This genetic tool is called CRISPR/Cas9. With it, you not only can recognize a viral sequence, but you can add to it, change it, or take it out. The Human Genome Project gave biomedical researchers what amounts to the genetic book of life. But what do you do with that information? “You’ve got the book,” says Doudna. “And you can see there’s a word that’s incorrect on page 147, but how do I get there and erase that word and fix it?” [1]

This genetic tool holds the prospect of working inside cells and making changes in specific genes far faster and for far less money than ever before. Doudna admitted, “And honestly, more frequently and recently, as I’ve got a bit older, I guess, you know, and you start to – I don’t know if it’s middle-age crisis or what it is – but, you know, you start to think about, what’s been the real impact of our work, right? Are we solving any problems in society? Are we doing work that’s going to make people’s lives better?” [2]

The researchers were looking were looking at one thing (how bacteria fight the flu) and found another (a genetic tool useful for man). In a 1754 letter to a friend, Horace Walpole coined a term for such scientific discoveries: serendipity (a “fortunate happenstance” or “pleasant surprise”). He referenced a Persian fairy tale, The Three Princes of Serendip and explained: the princes were “always making discoveries, by accidents and sagacity, of things which they were not in quest of.” Serendipity for Jennifer Doudna now also means the prospect of making a difference in the world.

• Providential serendipity in days of old

The fortunate occurrence and pleasant surprise has long been true in the kind providence of God with his people. Proverbs 16:9 NLT reminds us, “We can make our plans, but the Lord determines our steps.” And Ephesians 3:20-21 ESV holds forth of prospect of providential serendipity with this peon of praise:

Now to him who is able to do far more abundantly than all that we ask or think, according to the power at work within us, to him be glory in the church and in Christ Jesus throughout all generations, forever and ever. Amen.

In 2 Kings Chapter 7, four quarantined men (and, therefore, outcasts from society) enjoyed an occurrence of providential serendipity. And the four didn’t know it, but they had the opportunity to make a difference for society at just the right time.

An enemy regional power, Syria (also called Aram), had placed a land blockade around Samaria, the capital city of the northern kingdom of Israel. The Israelites had two choices: starve to death or surrender to a cruel enemy. At that time the average wage of a working man was about a silver shekel a month. Things got so bad in the city of Samaria that a donkey’s head (hardly nutritious) sold for 80 silver shekels and for 5 silver shekels you could buy a quart of dove’s dung (either pigeon’s manure or, based on Akkadian evidence, perhaps a nickname for carob pods). (2 Kings 6:25) [3]

It got worse. The king of Israel was walking along on the city’s protective wall when a woman cried out, “Help (literally “save me”), my lord, O king!” He replied, “If God won’t help (save) you, how can I? Can I allocate grain for you from the empty threshing floor or wine for you from the empty winepress? But, let me ask, what’s your trouble?” She answered, “This woman said to me, ‘Give your son, that we may eat him today, and we will eat my son tomorrow.’ So we boiled my son and ate him. And on the next day I said to her, ‘Give your son, that we may eat him.’ But she has hidden her son.” In revolting horror, the king ripped his clothes. Everybody around him could see that, underneath, he was wearing sackcloth (2 Ki 6:26-30). This was a crucial moment for the king: as he tore his clothes, would he engage in contrition and repentance from sin – emblematic of the sackcloth? Or would be the ripping be a form of bitterness and rage?

Sackcloth was coarse, rough, thick cloth made from black goats’ hair and used for sacks as well as worn by people in mourning (Genesis 37:34; 2 Samuel 3:31; Psalm 30:11; 35:13). Even the king felt deep anguish over these desperate conditions and secretly wore the uncomfortable cloth next to his skin. Upon hearing this story of cannibalism (I believe), a thought something like this must have flashed into the king’s mind, “A mother has committed almost an unspeakable crime. And now she wants justice – justice by enforcing this contract to commit further cannibalism. It’s all God’s fault. I know his law threatened punishments like famine if we Israelites engaged in prolonged sin [Lev 26:27-29; Deut 28:52-57]. But with the proper prayers, his prophet Elisha could have gotten us out of these intolerable, wretched conditions.” In any case, the king then ejaculated a curse, “May God do so to me and more also, if the head of Elisha the son of Shaphat remains on his shoulders today” (2 Ki 6:31).

The king dispatched an assassin to the house of Elisha, and it so happened that the elders of Israel were sitting inside with him. Elisha receives a vision and warns them, “An executioner is coming. Don’t let him in. The king has to be right behind him.” The assassin does indeed come. In the biblical text, who says what and where is not precisely told. Apparently, the king himself blurted out, “All this misery is from the Lord! Why should I wait any longer for help from the Lord?” (2 Ki 6:32-33).

Elisha replied, “Listen to this message from the Lord! By this time tomorrow in the markets of Samaria, both six quarts of choice flour and twelve quarts of barley grain will cost only one silver shekel.” The officer assisting the king retorted, “That couldn’t happen even if the Lord opened the windows of heaven!” But Elisha the prophet replied, “You will see it happen with your own eyes, but you won’t be able to eat any of it!” (2 Ki 7:1-2).

The king and his entourage break off the murderous attack and return to their quarters. Silently, night starts to fall silently over the city. Four Israelite men with a horrible and contagious skin disease (generically called leprosy) were outside the city gate, living apart from the general population. They were so hungry that sleep was difficult. They finally asked themselves, “We’re at the point of starvation. What can we do? Shall we try to go into the city? There’s no food in there and they just might kill us. Shall we stay where we are? We’ll die for sure. Shall we go over to the camp of the Syrians? Maybe they’ll kill us or just maybe they’ll give us some food. Let’s go over there. That’s our one and only chance.” So at twilight they start walking (2 Ki 7:3-5 NLT).

This little section (2 Ki 7:3-11) has a stair-step structure [4]. We climb up, see what’s really happening, and then climb down:

      Lepers outside the gate, v 3a
            Decision, vv 3b-4
                  Action, v 5
                        Explanation, vv 6-7
                  Action, v 8
            Decision, v 9
      Lepers back to the gate, vv 10-11

The “explanation” allows us to see and hear what the king and his minions are blind to:

For the Lord had caused the Syrian army to hear the clatter of speeding chariots and the galloping of horses and the sounds of a great army approaching. “The king of Israel has hired the Hittites and Egyptians to attack us!” they cried to one another. So they panicked and ran into the night, abandoning their tents, horses, donkeys, and everything else, as they fled for their lives.

Both the king and the prophet acknowledge the infinite, absolute, personal unseen Presence. But the king takes note only of harsh reality and asks, “Where is God?” He doubts or ignores God’s Word. On the other hand, the prophet as the man of faith remembers what God was for his people yesterday. And the prophet also affirms that God is not only the God of the past and of the dead, but God is also the God of the present and of the living. The Lord cannot be manipulated, but he has the freedom to act both in ways that uphold the order of the universe and in ways that surprise his people with blessings. The prophet both proclaims and believes God’s Word.

After pausing at the top of the literary stairs to take in a glimpse of who God really is, we start back down. The lepers arrive at the Syrian army’s camp and no one is there. They go in tent after tent and eat and drink. The hungry and thirsty are satisfied. At the same time they carry off the spoils of war abandoned by the soldiers – silver, gold, and clothing – and hide it as newfound wealth for themselves. Then a fear of God comes over them and they say to each other, “This is not right. This is a day of good news, and we aren’t sharing it with anyone! If we wait until morning, some calamity will certainly fall upon us. Come on, let’s go back and tell the people at the palace.” (2 Ki 7:8-9)

The lepers tell the gate keepers, the gate keepers tell the palace officials, and the king is awakened in the middle of the night for an emergency meeting with his military officers. Fearing the worst, the king urges inaction, “I know what has happened. The Syrians know we are starving, so they have left their camp and have hidden in the fields. They are expecting us to leave the city, and then they will take us alive and capture the city.” Fortunately, one officer either has faith in the word of the prophet or at least is less risk-adverse. He says, "We had better send out scouts to check into this. Let them take five of the remaining horses. If something happens to them, it will be no worse than if they stay here and die with the rest of us.” (2 Ki 7:12-13)

The scouts find solid evidence that the Syrian soldiers have fled in a mad rush somewhere beyond the Jordan River. The scouts return and tell the king, and word spreads. The four men who had long been quarantined with a dreaded skin disease got a welcome surprise after twilight and were privileged to tell some good news which was badly needed. As a result, they were privileged to make a difference in the world. What happened next? The Word of the Lord came true. “Then the people of Samaria rushed out and plundered the Syrian camp. So it was true that six quarts of choice flour were sold that day for one piece of silver, and twelve quarts of barley grain were sold for one piece of silver, just as the Lord had promised. The king appointed his officer to control the traffic at the gate, but he was knocked down and trampled to death as the people rushed out.” (2 Ki 7:14-17).

• Providential serendipity today

What about today? Is there still divine serendipity at work?

In the summer of 1997 a six-person team from the U.S planned a short-term mission to work with a veteran missionary couple (Rick and Melissa) in Russia. [5] The team planned to fly 5000 miles to Moscow, spend the night, then fly south another 1000 miles to the city of Elista, where they were to teach Bible classes at a day camp for local children. A few days before they left the States, the city officials forbad their teaching at the camp. So Rick – the local missionary – came up with the idea of them doing street preaching in Moscow. As the team arrived at the airport in Moscow, Moscow authorities informed Rick that the Americans would only be allowed to spend 24 hours in Moscow.

Trying to come up with an alternative, Rick contacted Vera (a young Christian woman) who lived in a village 50 miles north of Elista. Her village was predominately Buddhist, and these Buddhist villagers were openly hostile to Christians — so hostile that they had tried to murder Vera on two separate occasions. However, when Vera contacted the local school principal, he agreed to allow the team to teach English as a Second Language as long as there was no talk about Jesus while the group was at the school.

One of the women on the team, Diane, reported:

After more than 30 hours traveling, we finally arrived in Elista and learned about Plan C. After a short and restless night’s sleep, we piled into a rusted van for the 50 mile trek along a muddy, rut-filled road to a village that fit the cliché “in the middle of nowhere” to a tee. It’s hard to describe how disoriented and discouraged the team felt during that ride north as we were being jostled from side to side while breathing exhaust fumes coming up through a hole in the van’s floor. Other than myself, no one on the team had any experience teaching English (let alone English as a Second Language), plus we didn’t have any materials written in English with us other than our Bibles, which we were forbidden to us. In our minds, the mission trip was shaping up as a huge disaster.

But God is not the God of the past and of the dead only. He is also the God of the present and of the living. Diane and the team leader along with Rick the missionary went to visit that young Christian woman in the village, Vera. When Rick mentioned that Vera had attended Bible school in Moscow for a couple of years, Diane (quoted above) remembered that her pastor from the States had taught there. Diane asked Vera whether she had known her pastor and said his name. Vera immediately yelled out in excitement the pastor’s name, “Jim, Jim, Jim.” It turned out that Pastor Jim had given to his students a picture of his own congregation back in the States. In the center of that photograph were none other than Diane and her husband.

When Christians and Buddhists in the village heard the story of the photograph, they had to admit that it was by more than chance that the six-person team was there. Providential serendipity was at work. The team taught English in the classroom, played soccer with the village kids in the afternoon, and worshipped outdoors with the Christians at night. The Gospel was not shared in the classes, just like the six-person team had agreed to. But an openness to the Gospel was created in the villagers. Old hostilities had been overcome and a new environment of trust had been built. Two weeks later, missionary Rick took another team to that same village who were able to openly share the Gospel. As a result, nearly every villager placed his or her faith in Christ. The first team originally thought that their mission would be a failure. They came back to America understanding providential serendipity and having the privilege of making a difference in the world.

[1] Joe Palca, “In Hopes of Fixing Faulty Genes, One Scientist Starts With the Basics,” NPR Morning Edition, October 13, 2014. http://www.npr.org/blogs/health/2014/10/13/354934248/in-hopes-of-fixing-faulty-genes-one-scientist-starts-with-the-basics

[2] Ibid., transcript.

[3] Dale Ralph Davis, 2 Kings (Christian Focus Publications, Ltd.: Fearn, Ross-shire, 2005), p 118.

[4] Ibid. p 123.

[5] Diane Singer, “God’s Serendipity,” Christian Worldview Journal, January 7, 2013.
http://www.colsoncenter.org/the-center/columns/changepoint/19046-gods-serendipity

Art work: (head) Sharon Wagner, “Hang your hat; don’t turn your back” and (animals) Michael W. High, “Fascination” part of the exhibit “CLAY . . . Not the Usual Suspects,” the Gallery, Lakeland Community College, Kirtland, Ohio, September 25 to November 7, 2014.

Monday, October 13, 2014

The danger of drifting away

• Stay alert.

Back on Monday, April 21, off the north Queensland coast, five Australians anchored their 6.1m Haines Hunter boat near an exposed sandbar about 8:00 am. Leaving mobile phones and sun protection on board, the group set off towards an adjacent rocky outcrop (exposed part of bedrock) for a snorkeling expedition.

“Just as we got over to the rocks one of the boat co-owners … turned back and could see that the boat had shifted,” one of the five later told a local newspaper. Two men swam after the vessel but it quickly drifted beyond reach. “The northerly [wind] had really picked up and the boat was moving far more quickly,” the woman added.

The group scrawled a large SOS sign in the highest part of the sand bank and climbed to the highest rocks on the outcrop. “We had reef walkers on thankfully, but we had no food, water, cream, no hats, not much at all. We just looked for the highest ground, we looked for rocks where five of us could huddle together because we didn’t really want to separate, and we wanted to be out of the wind as best as possible.”

When the boat was found floating aimlessly, Queensland Water Police notified local rescue at 2:15 pm. A rescue helicopter was dispatched. The chopter crew spotted the five stranded people about 4:00 pm, hoisted them into the chopter, and brought them back to the base a bit burnt by the sun but safe and sound. [1]

In life, there is also the danger of spiritual drift. You think the boat of your life is securely anchored and, before you realize it, you have drifted. But the outcome will be much more deadly than the possibilities were for those five Australians. Spiritually, the outcome is either everlasting life or everlasting loss. Hebrews chapter 2:1-4 posts this spiritual warning sign:

1Therefore we must pay much closer attention to what we have heard, lest we drift away from it. 2For since the message declared by angels proved to be reliable, and every transgression or disobedience received a just retribution, 3how shall we escape if we neglect such a great salvation? It was declared at first by the Lord, and it was attested to us by those who heard, 4while God also bore witness by signs and wonders and various miracles and by gifts of the Holy Spirit distributed according to his will.

• Learn the truth.

One way of looking at the literary structure of Hebrews is to see five major sections, each of which has two parts: “learn the truth / live the truth.” [2]

1:1-4 Introduction
1:5-14 Learn; 2:1-4 Live (danger: drifting from the gospel)
2:5-18 Learn; 3:1-4:16 Live (danger: disbelieving the gospel)
5:1-10 Learn; 5:11-6:20 Live (danger: dullness toward the gospel)
7:1-10:18 Learn; 10:19-39 Live (danger: despising the gospel)
11:1-40 Learn; 12:1-29 Live (danger: defying the gospel)
13:1-25 Conclusion

We can’t live the truth as urged by Hebrews 2:1-4, unless we learn the truth just taught. So let’s summarize Hebrews chapter one.

Human history is called “the days,” and throughout “the days” God has spoken words to the human race. In the first phase of speaking, God spoke by the Hebrew prophets to the Hebrew people at various times and in various ways (1:1). Most notably, God spoke his law through Moses – the covenant at Mount Sinai with its warnings of blessings for obedience and disasters for disobedience. But in “these last days” – the last part of human history – he has spoken by his Son (1:2). His Son has the exact nature of God the Father and is the person through the world was created and who upholds the world by his powerful word (1:2-3). The Son came to earth and made purification for sins and after this accomplishment sat down at the right hand of the Majesty on high (1:3).

God’s speaking in words (his revelation) through the prophets was accomplished through angels – who are created ministers ready to do God’s bidding (Psalm 104:4). The new revelation in these last days is through the Son. The superiority of the new revelation to the old can be demonstrated in many ways (the whole book of Hebrews), but the first way is to compare the Son to the angels (chapter one).

The Son has the same nature as God; the angels are only created servants (Heb 1:5-7). The first revelation uses two primary names for God: Elohim (God) and YHWH (Lord). The first revelation calls the Son “Elohim/God” in Psalm 45:-6-7 with Isaiah 61:1 and calls the Son “YHWH/Lord” in Isaiah 61:3 with Psalm 102:25-27 (Heb 1:8-12). The angels never have this attribution.

Therefore, the angels are called upon to worship the Son in Deuteronomy 32:43 (Gk) with Ps 97:7 (Hebrews 1:6). Moreover, God says to the Son, “Sit at my right hand until I make your enemies a footstool for your feet” in Psalm 110:1 (Heb 1:13). God never said this to the angels, who are simply ministering spirits sent out to serve (Heb 1:14).

Let us pause and, along with the angels, worship the Lord Jesus Christ, the Son of God – who has the very nature of God. Let us appreciate him, honor him, reverence him. For he it is who was the radiance of the glory of God while he lived on this earth. He it is who created everything and who holds all creation together so that it does not devolve into instant chaos. He it is who made purification for our sins – our root problem. And he it is who became human and spoke to us the words of God as God’s final prophet.

• Live the truth.

Having learned the truth (Hebrews chapter 1), we must now continue to believe and live the truth (Hebrews 2:1-4) despite the pressures of life. The original Jewish readers were asked to remember what high value they placed on the law of Moses, the revelation given at Mount Sinai, the revelation in which angels played a part (Deuteronomy 33:2 Greek translation; Psalm 68:17). And they were asked to remember the punishments for every transgression of that law and for every disobedience to that law (Heb 2:2).

And then the original readers were asked to remember the new revelation, the gospel given directly by YHWH, the Lord, that is to say, the Lord Jesus Christ (Heb 2:3). That revelation was passed on from the Lord through those who heard him, that is to say, the apostles supremely but also other disciples. All of these were eye-witnesses of what was actually said and what actually happened. Elohim (God) confirmed the truth of the message of his Son by means of signs, wonders, miracles, and gifts of the Holy Spirit. If nobody got away with anything under the old revelation, how can you expect to get away with ignoring and neglecting the new message – given by the Lord himself, proclaimed by eye-witnesses, and authenticated with miracles by God the Father and the Holy Spirit?

We are now face-to-face with the warning of Hebrews 2:1. “Therefore we must pay much closer attention to what we have heard, lest we drift away from it.” The two verbs in the original Greek “pay much closer attention” (prosecheo) and “drift away” (pararreo) are used in various contexts in ancient Greek literature:

A dramatic word is employed for “drift away,” pararreo, which means “to flow by” or “slip away from.” It describes that carelessness of mind which, perhaps occupied by other things, is not aware it is losing ground. Plato used it of something slipping away from the memory, and Plutarch of a ring slipping from a finger. Another figure often suggested is that of a ship loose from its moorings. The danger highlighted is that of a great loss occurring unnoticed. The cause is not taking seriously the words spoken to them. Inattention or apathy will rob them of their treasure. [3]

But actually both verbs may have a nautical sense. New Testament scholar William Barclay explains:

Prosecho can mean to moor a ship; and pararreo can be used of a ship which has been carelessly allowed to slip past a harbour or a haven because the mariner has forgotten to allow for the wind or the current or the tide. So, then, this first verse could be very vividly translated: “Therefore, we must the more eagerly anchor our lives to the things that we have been taught lest the ship of life drift past the harbour and be wrecked.” It is a vivid picture of a ship drifting to destruction because the pilot sleeps. [4]

The message of the Hebrew prophets is the Old Testament. The message of the Lord and his hearers is the New Testament. Together they comprise the Bible. Have you anchored your life to the message of the Bible? Your moods will swing, your circumstances will change, only the Word of God will remain constant. In a radio talk during World War II, C.S. Lewis spoke of the importance of training yourself in the virtue of faith. In part he told his listeners:

make sure that, if you have once accepted Christianity, then some of its main doctrines shall be deliberately held before your mind for some time every day. That is why daily prayers and religious reading and church going are necessary parts of the Christian life. We have to be continually reminded of what we believe. Neither this belief nor any other will automatically remain alive in the mind. It must be fed. And as a matter of fact, if you examined a hundred people who had lost their faith in Christianity, I wonder how many of them would turn out to have been reasoned out of it by honest argument? Do not most people simply drift away? [5]

The Book of Hebrews urges us, as the years of our life pass, that we “we must pay much closer attention” (Heb 2:1). Have you slacked off? Have you neglected the Old Testament, the fourfold Gospel, the Acts, the Epistles, the Book of Revelation? It’s time for greater attention.

There is also the matter of drift. How you compared the current status of your beliefs and your behavior to the doctrine and morals of the Gospel and its application by the Apostles? Have you shifted off course from the Bible? It’s time to get back on track – today.

A recent news article speaks of the sons of two prominent Christian leaders who have departed from the faith of their parents [6]. Bart Campolo, is the son of Tony Campolo, a prominent progressive evangelical. The blogger for Christianity Today said:

The last I knew, Bart had followed his dad and was preaching and practicing a left-leaning, though evangelical faith.

But after I Googled his name, I found he didn’t seem to be a part of any Christian ministry, despite having helped found several. He has not blogged at Sojourners in over three years. His personal website is gone. Mission Year, which he helped to start, references him as a co-founder, but he is nowhere among those listed as currently serving with the ministry.

While his Wikipedia page only mentions his involvement in Christian causes, I knew I had read about a secular connection. But, just a few clicks down I saw he is the Humanist chaplain at the University of Southern California and a speaker for the Secular Student Alliance (SSA).

The blogger had an immediate reaction, which – upon reflection – he had to change:

I have to confess, the immediate reaction I had was that this is why progressive evangelicalism and particularly mainline Protestantism (Campolo straddled both) can be dead ends, often failing to keep the next generation. And, there is some statistical support for that reaction (at least for mainliners). . . . Then, I started to reconsider.

I remembered Frank Schaeffer, son of the late Francis Schaeffer. If robust evangelicalism guaranteed continuing fidelity, the younger Schaeffer would not be writing odd books about his mother’s sex life [Sex, Mom, and God: How the Bible's Strange Take on Sex Led to Crazy Politics--and How I Learned to Love Women (and Jesus) Anyway, 2011] and describing his own spiritual life as an atheist who believes in God [Why I Am An Atheist Who Believes In God, 2014].

Am I drifting from the Gospel? What kind of influence on others am I? Are those under my care or sphere of influence drifting? What actions do I need to take? Is it high time to “watch and pray”?


[1] Harry Clarke, “Five people rescued after scrawling SOS on sandbar off north Queensland coast,” The Courier-Mail, April 22, 2014. http://www.couriermail.com.au/news/queensland/five-people-rescued-after-scrawling-sos-on-sandbar-off-north-queensland-coast/story-fnihsrf2-1226891816280?nk=16c0615c5f37d5fc387ffb8cedb85fb1

[2] Here, in my own words, I follow the research article J. C. Fenton, “The Argument in Hebrews,” Studio Evangelica 7 (1982), pp 175-76 and similar studies cited by David J. MacLeod, “The Literary Structure of the Book of Hebrews,” Bibliotheca Sacra 146 (April 1989), p 189.

[3] Ray C. Stedman, Hebrews (IVP New Testament Commentary Series), Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 1992), on Heb 2:1-4. http://www.raystedman.org/hebrews2/heb2comm1.html

[4] William Barclay, Hebrews (Daily Study Bible), Edinburgh: St. Andrew Press, 1975.
http://www.studylight.org/commentaries/dsb/view.cgi?bk=57&ch=2

[5] C.S. Lewis, Mere Christianity, New York: HarperCollins, 1952. PDF version p 70 of 108.

[6] Ed Stetzer, “Deconversion: Some Thoughts on Bart Campolo’s Departure from Christianity,” The Exchange; a blog, Christianity Today, September 30, 2014. http://www.christianitytoday.com/edstetzer/2014/september/deconversion-some-thoughts-on-bart-campolos-departure-from-.html



Art featured: (head) Ikuko Miklowski, “A as in …” and (yes, no) Judith Salomon, “Tile Series,” in the exhibit Clay … Not the Usual Suspects, September 25 to November 7, 2014, Gallery at Lakeland Community College, Kirkland, Ohio.

Saturday, October 4, 2014

The Power of the Book

• Take up and read

On the West Coast in the late 1950s, when she was just 8 years old, a girl named Storm began picking fruit as a full-time farm laborer for less than $1 per hour. Storm and her family moved often, living in Native American migrant worker camps without electricity or running water. She wasn’t allowed to have books because they are too heavy to carry around when you keep moving from place to place. She recalled:

The conditions were pretty terrible. I once told someone that I learned to fight with a knife long before I learned how to ride a bicycle. And when you were grinding day after day after day, there’s no room in you for hope. There just isn’t. You don’t even know it exists. There’s nothing to aspire to, except filling your hungry belly.

When she was 12, something arrived in camp that changed her life: a bookmobile came to the fields. She approached it but hesitated. A staff member waved her in and explained it was completely free to check out books for two weeks – no strings attached. She tells about the books:

And I took them home and I devoured them. I didn’t just read them, I devoured them. And I came back in two weeks and had more questions. And he [the staff member] gave me more books and that started it. That taught me that hope was not just a word, and it gave me the courage to leave the camps. That’s where the books made the difference. By the time I was 15, I knew there was a world outside of the camps. I believed I could find a place in it and I did.

She eventually went to night school and worked in a library for 30 years. [1]

There is a much more powerful book: the Scriptures. And it tells not just of a wider reality beyond the place where we live, but of unseen Reality. And it leads us to a hope not just of improved living conditions but of eternal life. The Gospel explains it in John chapter 5.

• What are the Scriptures?

In John 5, the Lord was in a lengthy discourse with the religious leaders in Jerusalem. During the talk he said he was the Son of God (equal with God, 5:19) and the Son of Man. And he gave three witnesses to the fact of his divine nature (having the same being and powers as God does) and divine authority (his role of judge in the Day of Judgment when he calls the dead out of the graves and some of the dead experience the resurrection for life and the others experience the resurrection for judgment), 5:19-29. These are the three witnesses. Witness one was John the Baptist (5:32-25). Witness two was the miracles Jesus was performing (5:36). And witness three was the Scriptures (5:37-47), the voice of God. Let’s look at number three in depth.

37And the Father who sent me has himself borne witness about me. His voice you have never heard, his form you have never seen, 38and you do not have his word abiding in you, for you do not believe the one whom he has sent. 39You search the Scriptures because you think that in them you have eternal life; and it is they that bear witness about me, 40yet you refuse to come to me that you may have life. 41I do not receive glory from people. 42But I know that you do not have the love of God within you. 43I have come in my Father's name, and you do not receive me. If another comes in his own name, you will receive him. 44How can you believe, when you receive glory from one another and do not seek the glory that comes from the only God? 45Do not think that I will accuse you to the Father. There is one who accuses you: Moses, on whom you have set your hope. 46For if you believed Moses, you would believe me; for he wrote of me. 47But if you do not believe his writings, how will you believe my words?”

Behind everything we can see, feel, and touch, there is a personal, absolute, invisible Reality – present with us and yet utterly transcendent from us: God. He can be overlooked, he can be denied, but he cannot be willed away. He is there. In the fullness of God, there is the invisible Father. The invisible Father sent the second Person of the Deity, the Word into the world to be seen, heard, and touched. The Word – the Son of God – became a human being, the Son of Man.

However, the personal, absolute, invisible Reality has always had a voice. He is there and he is not silent. That voice has taken three notable forms. First, there is the creation itself:

The heavens declare the glory of God,
and the sky above proclaims his handiwork.
Day to day pours out speech,
and night to night reveals knowledge….
Their voice goes out through all the earth,
and their words to the end of the world. (Psalm 19:1-2,4)

Historically, the third major voice has been the Word who became flesh, known to us as Jesus Christ:

For the law was given through Moses; grace and truth came through Jesus Christ. No one has ever seen God; the only God, who is at the Father’s side, he has made him known. (John 1:17-18)

There has been a critical second way: the Scriptures. Notice the words of the Lord from John 5. God the invisible Father does not have a form that you can see with your eyes, nor does he have a voice that you can hear with your ears (v 37). Nevertheless, he has a word (v 38) and that word is the Scriptures (v 38). You can hear him by reading and listening to this written word.

The Scriptures are the voice of God. Are we listening?


• Which are the Scriptures?

And how can I identify that written word, the Scriptures? In this section of our exploration, the reader becomes a gatherer of evidence. This requires the patience of a scientist in a laboratory.

First, the Scriptures had a contemporary portion, as Jesus was speaking. It consisted of the writings of the Hebrew law-giver, Moses (v 45-47). As passages in the Gospel show, it also consisted of the Hebrew prophets (both history and prophecy) and the Hebrew poetical writings (chiefly the Psalms). To marshal the data from the four-fold Gospel and from contemporary sources would require an article of significant length. We will need to be content with sampling. Here are three examples each from prophets and poets:

At that hour Jesus said to the crowds, “Have you come out as against a robber, with swords and clubs to capture me? Day after day I sat in the temple teaching, and you did not seize me. But all this has taken place that the Scriptures of the prophets might be fulfilled.” (Matt 26:55-56)

And he began to say to them, “Today this Scripture has been fulfilled in your hearing.” (Luke 4:21 citing the prophet Isaiah 61:1-2)

He [Jesus] said to them [the disciples], “. . . . For I tell you that this Scripture must be fulfilled in me: ‘And he was numbered with the transgressors.’ For what is written about me has its fulfillment.” (Luke 22:36-37 citing the prophet Isaiah 53:12)

Jesus said to them, “Have you never read in the Scriptures: ‘The stone that the builders rejected has become the cornerstone; this was the Lord's doing, and it is marvelous in our eyes’?” (Matt 21:42 citing Psalm 118:22, 23)

Jesus answered them, “Is it not written in your Law, ‘I said, you are gods’? If he called them gods to whom the word of God came—and Scripture cannot be broken— . . .” (John 10:34-25 citing Psalm 82:6)

When Jesus had spoken these words, he lifted up his eyes to heaven, and said, “. . . . I have guarded them [the disciples], and not one of them has been lost except the son of destruction, that the Scripture might be fulfilled.” (John 17:1,12 citing Psalm 109:8)

In Alexandria, Egypt, the Hebrew Scriptures (or Old Testament) were translated into Greek (3rd to 1st centuries BC) called the Septuagint. In Alexandria the codex (pages sewn together into a book) became popular. In the Septuagint the Old Testament ran from Genesis to Malachi. However, in Jerusalem, where scrolls continued to be used, the scrolls of the Hebrew Scriptures were typically stored in three bins and regarded as three categories: (1) the law, (2) the prophets and (3) “the rest of the books” (Prologue to Sirach 1:1). Sirach (also called Ecclesiasticus) dates to about 180 BC with the prologue by his grandson dating to about 132 BC). The broken fragments of 4QMMT (2nd century BC) from the Dead Sea Scrolls seem to imply an arrangement similar to the threefold arrangement of Sirach (Moses, prophets, David & events):

      [And] we have [also written] to you so that you may have understanding in the book of Moses [and] in the book[s of the Pr]ophets and in Davi[id and in the events] of ages past . . . [2]

Regardless of the precise arrangement of the books among Jewry in the ancient world, the words of Jesus signify the contents of the Hebrew Scriptures/Old Testament. First:

Then he said to them, “These are my words that I spoke to you while I was still with you, that everything written about me in the Law of Moses and the Prophets and the Psalms must be fulfilled.” (Luke 24:44)

In the standard “scrolls” arrangement for the third division of the Hebrew Scriptures, the Book of Psalms was placed at the beginning and could therefore serve of the name of the whole division.

[Jesus said,] “Woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! . . . . Therefore I send you prophets and wise men and scribes, some of whom you will kill and crucify, and some you will flog in your synagogues and persecute from town to town, so that on you may come all the righteous blood shed on earth, from the blood of righteous Abel to the blood of Zechariah the son of Barachiah, whom you murdered between the sanctuary and the altar. (Matt 23:29,24-25)

Zachariah was not the last martyr. But in the standard “scrolls” arrangement of the Hebrew Scriptures, Abel (the first martyr) was slain in the first book, Genesis (Gen 4:8), and Zacharias (the last martyr) was slain in the last book, Chronicles (2 Chronicles 24:20 -23).

Our brief survey shows that the Scriptures had an existing portion during the ministry of Jesus and that it comprised what Christians call the books of the Old Testament. Questions about precise composition cannot be answered here. (Examples: Were Esther and Ezekiel regarded as canonical by rabbis during the ministry of Jesus? What books did the Dead Sea Scrolls community regard as Scripture? What about the deutero-canonicals recognized at two church councils in North Africa?)

The Scriptures also have a future portion beyond when Jesus was speaking in Jerusalem. Jesus said, “I am the way, the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me” (John 14:6). But he himself did not write any letters or books. Instead “he appointed twelve (whom he also named apostles) so that they might be with him and he might send them out to preach . . .” (Mark 3:14). “Apostle” was a personal envoy, a special and exclusive representative. [3] Jesus told this group, “Whoever receives you receives me, and whoever receives me receives him who sent me” (Matt 10:40; cf. John 13:20).

For this purpose Jesus endowed the apostles with the Holy Spirit—the Spirit of truth—who will
teach them all things and recall to mind what Jesus had said, will guide them into fullness
of truth and will also explain the future (John 14:26; 15:26; 16:13-15). In Hebrews 2:1-4 the apostles are compared to the angels of the Old Testament as transmitters of God's revelation. Heb 2:3 asks us, “How shall we escape if we neglect such a great salvation? It was declared at first by the Lord, and it was attested to us by those who heard,” the apostles.

“Last of all, as to one untimely born, he [Christ] appeared also to me [Paul]” (1 Cor 15:8). This apostolic office gave Paul a peculiar authority shared by all the apostles: “So then, brothers, stand firm and hold to the traditions that you were taught by us, either by our spoken word or by our letter” (2 Thess 2:15). The apostles handed down sacred traditions from Jesus Christ explained and enlarged upon by the Holy Spirit. Their authoritative writings are also Scripture. As Peter says of Paul,

And count the patience of our Lord as salvation, just as our beloved brother Paul also wrote to you according to the wisdom given him, as he does in all his letters when he speaks in them of these matters. There are some things in them that are hard to understand, which the ignorant and unstable twist to their own destruction, as they do the other Scriptures. (2 Peter 3:15-16)

At the time of the Lord’s earthly ministry, the Scriptures had a contemporary portion – the Old Testament – and they had a future portion – the New Testament, the writings directly sponsored by the apostles. But . . .


• So what?

Unfortunately, Jesus had to tell his listeners, as recorded in John chapter 5, “39You search the Scriptures because you think that in them you have eternal life; and it is they that bear witness about me, 40yet you refuse to come to me that you may have life.” It is possible to never hear or read the Scriptures. It is possible to read and re-read the Scriptures but allow personal prejudice to miss the point. It is possible to give diligent attention to the Scriptures but miss the message by getting bogged down in the minutiae of detail. Where do you stand?

Journalist Marvin Olasky's grandfather was born in the Ukrainian town of Olyevsk, the Anglicization of which became their American surname. The grandfather, Louis Olasky, originally Lepke ben Yehoshua, escaped the Czarist army in 1912 and ended up in Malden, Massachusetts.

Raised Jewish, as a teenager, grandson Marvin Olasky read H.G. Wells’ History of the World and Sigmund Freud’s Future of an Illusion.” By age 14, he said, “I thought all this belief in God was just childish stuff.” While in college during the Vietnam War, his non-belief in God led to embracing communism.

However, as a doctoral candidate in American Culture at the University of Michigan, he needed to demonstrate foreign language mastery. So he chose Russian "in order to speak to my Soviet big brothers," he recalled. Along the way he picked up a New Testament in Russian and started reading — very slowly “puzzling out the words.”

“I started believing there was really something here. This is not just a book written by man, there’s something inspired by God in this,” he recalled. This is the power of the Book, the Scriptures. The Scriptures have self-authenticating power and life-changing power. But it is not enough to have a vague belief, “Hey, there’s really something here." You must find out what the Scriptures are all about and embrace that.

Then Marvin Olasky got an assignment to teach a course in early American literature — which largely consisted of the sermons of leading Puritan preachers Jonathan Edwards and Increase Mather, as well as authors such as Nathaniel Hawthorne (dead men from 300 years ago). Wholesome books have uplifting power — and these books led the young Olasky to come to personal, repentant faith in Jesus Christ. Marvin’s worldview and life were transformed. He received the sure hope of eternal life in the age to come, and he received transforming, spiritual life now. [4]

Are you willing to search the Scriptures and come to Christ that you may have life?


[1] “Once Forbidden, Books Become A Lifeline For A Young Migrant Worker,” StoryCorps, NPR Morning Edition, May 30, 2014. A conversation of Storm Reyes with his son, Jeremy Hagquist. http://www.npr.org/2014/05/30/317035044/once-forbidden-books-become-a-lifeline-for-a-young-migrant-worker

[2] James VanderKam & Peter Flint, The Meaning of the Dead Sea Scrolls (London: T&T Clark, 2002), pp 169-172.

[3] R. David Rightmire, “Apostle,” Baker’s Dictionary of Biblical Theology, (ed) Walter A. Elwell (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Books, 1996). http://www.biblestudytools.com/dictionaries/bakers-evangelical-dictionary/apostle.html

[4] Mark A. Kellner, “Marvin Olasky preaches journalism through the lens of scripture, faith,” Desert News, September 18, 2014. http://national.deseretnews.com/article/2371/marvin-olasky-preaches-journalism-through-the-lens-of-scripture-faith.html

Friday, September 19, 2014

What defines your life?

• The power of starting with the end in mind

“Well, it’s glorious but it’s also tough because all the pressure is on you. You’ve got all those people out there that call you a legend and an icon and all that stuff. You kinda gotta prove it.” So said Merle Haggard after recently playing two sold-out nights at the Ryman Auditorium in Nashville, Tennessee. At 77, Haggard — who helped create the twangy electrified Bakersfield [California] Sound in country music — tours the country about two weeks each month.

Haggard had lung surgery after a cancer diagnosis in November 2008, and he said an early, but incorrect, diagnosis had him thinking he had only a short time to live. "And then they told me, ‘No, we’re wrong. It’s only just a little benign condition that we can get rid of,’" Haggard said. "It was sort of a disappointment. I was ready to go." [1]



A terminal illness can cause a person to focus on what’s really important in life, enabling him or her to get “ready to go.” But actually, there’s a principle at work here, important for any age or circumstance of life: start with the end in mind. The Gospel presents this life principle in Luke chapter 12. Let’s, you and I, explore it together.

In Luke 12, a crushing crowd of thousands had gathered to hear Jesus teach. There were so many that some were practically bumping into one another. Suddenly a man came forward and demanded, “Teacher, tell my brother to divide the inheritance with me.” It was not uncommon for Jews of the time to take their unsettled disputes to respected rabbis. But Jesus replied, “Man, who made me a judge or arbitrator over you?”

This became a teachable moment and the Lord turned to the huge crowd and said, “Take care, and be on your guard against all covetousness, for one's life does not consist in the abundance of his possessions.” We don’t use the word “covetousness” in our contemporary vocabulary. But we do say the related word “greed.” Covetousness is strong desire to have that which belongs to another. It is forbidden in number 10 of the Ten Commandments. The 10th Commandment is culturally couched for the time of Moses and tells us: you shall not covet anything that belongs to your neighbor, including his house, his wife, his servants, his ox or donkey, or anything that belongs to him (Exodus 20:17).

In modern society it cuts two ways. Greed can be praised. On May 18, 1986, for example, Wall Street trader Ivan Boesky advised the graduating students of UC Berkeley’s School of Business Administration: “Greed is all right, by the way. I want you to know that. I think greed is healthy. You can be greedy and still feel good about yourself.” [2] Also in modern society, documentaries depict greed as driving people into carefully constructed, smooth sounding fraudulent schemes that leave behind broken dreams and empty bank accounts for victims, and prison and humiliation for the perpetrators.

At the moment it’s important to see that Jesus is getting at (1) moral principle and (2) one’s worldview that underpins moral principle. Greed and covetousness, he maintains, are grievous violations of the law of God – the moral law inherent in the universe. And, why?, Jesus asks. The reason is the worldview from which this moral principle is derived. Says Jesus: “Life is not defined by what you have, even when you have a lot.” (Luke 12:17 MSG). Or, translated into English a little differently, “Your true life is not made up of the things you own, no matter how rich you may be.” (Luke 12:17 GNT). Jesus is contrasting his teaching to materialism, which is a fixation on material things. In our day, materialism is also the philosophy which says that matter is the fundamental substance in nature and that everything that happens (including mental activities) is the result of material interactions. “All that matters is what I have” is materialism at the practical level. “Matter and energy are all that exist” is materialism at the philosophical level.

To make his meaning clear, the Lord tells a simple parable:

The land of a rich man produced plentifully, and he thought to himself, “What shall I do, for I have nowhere to store my crops?” And he said, “I will do this: I will tear down my barns and build larger ones, and there I will store all my grain and my goods. And I will say to my soul, ‘Soul, you have ample goods laid up for many years; relax, eat, drink, be merry.’” But God said to him, “Fool! This night your soul is required of you, and the things you have prepared, whose will they be?” So is the one who lays up treasure for himself and is not rich toward God.” (Luke 12:16-21 ESV)

Jesus here makes two crucial observations centered on what the man said and what God said.

• The supreme allegiance of the covetous person is on self.

The man of the parable focuses on “me” and “my”: what shall I do? I have nowhere to store my crops. I will do this. I will tear down my barns. I will build larger ones. I will store all my grain and my goods. I will say to my soul (the self), “Relax, eat, drink, be merry.” It’s all about me and mine.

In her 1938 novella, Anthem, Ayn Rand, advocates this point of view as a philosophy of life for individuals and society. In Part Eleven her hero has broken free from a collectivist, totalitarian society and proclaims [3]:

My hands . . . My spirit . . . My sky . . . My forest . . . This earth of mine. . . . What must I say besides? These are the words. This is the answer.

I stand here on the summit of the mountain. I lift my head and I spread my arms. This, my body and spirit, this is the end of the quest. I wished to know the meaning of things. I am the meaning. I wished to find a warrant for being. I need no warrant for being, and no word of sanction upon my being. I am the warrant and the sanction.

It is my eyes which see, and the sight of my eyes grants beauty to the earth. It is my ears which hear, and the hearing of my ears gives its song to the world. It is my mind which thinks, and the judgement of my mind is the only searchlight that can find the truth. It is my will which chooses, and the choice of my will is the only edict I must respect. . . .

Whatever road I take, the guiding star is within me; the guiding star and the loadstone which point the way. They point in but one direction. They point to me. . . .
     
I do not surrender my treasures, nor do I share them. The fortune of my spirit is not to be blown into coins of brass and flung to the winds as alms for the poor of the spirit. I guard my treasures: my thought, my will, my freedom. And the greatest of these is freedom.

I owe nothing to my brothers, nor do I gather debts from them. I ask none to live for me, nor do I live for any others. I covet no man's soul, nor is my soul theirs to covet....

What is my freedom, if all creatures, even the botched and the impotent, are my masters? What is my life, if I am but to bow, to agree and to obey?

But I am done with this creed of corruption.

I am done with the monster of "We," the word of serfdom, of plunder, of misery, falsehood and shame.

And now I see the face of god, and I raise this god over the earth, this god whom men have sought since men came into being, this god who will grant them joy and peace and pride.
     
This god, this one word:

"I."

Ayn Rand has escaped the collectivist, totalitarian mindset of societies like the old Soviet Union. She has searched for ultimate truth and meaning and believes she has found it. It is “me,” the self. The selfish gene has triumphantly found its maker: itself. And now, what is there to do? To quote the parable, “Then I will say to myself, ‘Lucky man! You have all the good things you need for many years. Take life easy, eat, drink, and enjoy yourself!’ ” (Lk 12:19 Good News Translation)

In the parable, Jesus makes a second crucial point.

• The supreme focus of the covetous person is on this world.

The man rich in worldly wealth focuses on his land, his crops, his barns, his grain, his worldly goods and possessions. Ayn Rand’s hero focuses on my hands, my spirit, my sky, my forest, this earth of mine, my body and spirit, my eyes, my mind, my will, my treasures. In the parable, the forgotten Being speaks. “But God said to him, ‘You fool! This very night you will have to give up your life; then who will get all these things you have kept for yourself?’” (Lk 12:20 Good News Translation)

Jesus is presenting a life principle here that is applicable in many circumstances: start with the end in mind. I remember so well the 1984 book Managing and some of its pearls of wisdom. Its author, the retired president and much respected manager of a public company, said, “You read a book from beginning to end. You run a business the opposite way. You start with the end and then you do everything you must to reach it.” Jesus wants us to think ahead to our final day on earth (we know not when) and to ask ourselves: what do I consider most important in life? What is of everlasting significance?

At one time in his life, Edward S. Little II was captivated by Ayn Rand’s philosophy:

In the spring of 1962, an awkward and philosophically oriented 15-year-old raised in an utterly secular home, I read The Fountainhead and then Atlas Shrugged. Those books triggered a philosophical (and, unknowingly, spiritual) revolution…. For three years I followed Rand, read every word she published, studied Objectivism and its moral, political, and economic implications . . . Because my family lived in New York City, I was able to enroll in a 20-session “Basics of Objectivism” course at the Nathaniel Branden Institute…. When Branden finished his lecture, Rand herself would often answer questions. Among the memorabilia from that period of my life is a scrap of paper with Rand’s autograph, the letters sharp and angular. I also enrolled in “Objectivist Economics,” taught by a very young Alan Greenspan. [4]

In college, two figures broke Edward Little’s chains to Ayn Rand’s mixture of atheism, materialism, Reason, and the self as the supreme being. In his philosophy class, Little encountered the first figure:

In Rand’s teaching, Aristotle served as a kind of philosophical hero. Plato, with his tendency toward mysticism, represented philosophical depravity for Rand. So I entered college predisposed to reject Plato, and came armed with Objectivist and Aristotelian weapons for the battle. Then I actually read Plato in a philosophy class. I was shocked to find much to commend his vision of a Reality that is more than the reality we can see….

The Phaedo was particularly disturbing, as Plato’s Socrates prepares to die and in the process comforts his friends with an admittedly non-Christian notion of the afterlife. What troubled me most was that it made sense, that the one-dimensional universe of Objectivism did not do justice to the facts. Could Rand be wrong? My certainty began to crumble. [5]

Then, after his mind was opened to the possibility of a Reality beyond what we can see, Little encountered a second figure: Jesus. In his sophomore year, he enrolled in a two-semester “Bible as Literature” course. He was majoring in ancient history, and biblical history figured into the wider picture. The course was taught by a former pastor turned agnostic, who delighted to shake the faith of students using historical-critical methods. But Someone had something else in mind. Little tells us:

Reading the Bible for the first time, encountering the text and laying aside the professor’s debunking attitude, I met a God who laid claim to my life, a Savior who invited (or, more precisely, demanded) my allegiance. Over the course of two semesters, something happened. I can’t precisely date it. But friends tell me that they noticed a change. By the time I was halfway through the New Testament course, I was referring to Jesus in the present rather than the past tense…. Paul describes the experience of his Corinthian converts, and my own experience, with overwhelming and almost inarticulate joy: “You were washed, you were sanctified, you were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ and in the Spirit of our God” (1 Cor. 6:11, RSV). [6]

Jesus confronts us with a choice. Where is your allegiance and my allegiance? Is it to self as supreme? This is covetousness, a very grievous sin. Where is your focus and my focus? Is it to this world as supreme? This is a very grievous philosophical error. After the parable Jesus concluded, “But God said to him, ‘Fool!’ . . . This is how it is with those who pile up riches for themselves but are not rich in God's sight” (Lk 12:21 GNT). Do you close your mind and perceive only part of reality or do you open your mind and acknowledge all of reality?

• For those who are rich toward God, their supreme allegiance is God through Jesus Christ and their supreme focus is God’s kingdom – which is, his rulership, authority, and fatherly care.

A question logically arises. Suppose I want to become rich in God’s sight? How would I do that? Jesus immediately points us in the right direction (Lk 12:22-34).

• “And he said to his disciples . . .” (v 22a). There is only one place to start: discipleship with Jesus. Turn away from self as the rudder steering your life and turn to the Lord Jesus Christ. With him you will find forgiveness of sins and power for living. Join his people, the Church, as his disciple. You can as an individual and join a spiritual family.

• “Do not be anxious about your life” (v 22b). Most people aren’t stockpiled with money and don’t have their storehouses bursting from the abundance of material possessions like the rich man of the parable. Some have legitimate concern for enough food, adequate clothing, sufficient shelter, and even physical life, health, and safety. They can feel besieged by worry, nervousness, and anxiety. But, Jesus tells his disciples, if God takes care of little creatures like ravens and lilies, won’t he take much more care of you? So cultivate an attitude of confidence and trust in God in place of worry and anxiety.

• “Seek God’s kingdom” (v 31). The “kingdom” of God is God’s rule through his
Messiah, Jesus. It is his kingly power, authority, sovereignty, glory, and fatherly care. It is both a present reality to accept (Lk 17:20-21) and a future event to anticipant (Lk 19:11-27). Treat the living God – Father, Son, and Holy Spirit – as the one whom you supremely love. Accept his authority, take note of his presence, believe his teachings, and follow his ethics.

• “Fear not” (v 32). Amid alarming circumstances, continue to cultivate an attitude of quiet confidence and firmly relying trust in the living God.

• “Sell your possessions, and give to the needy” (v 33). Jesus didn’t say, “Sell all your possessions” but “sell your possessions and give to the needy” – that is to say, be generous.

Have balance. Later, Jesus will give some instruction that is best included here. Because of the contrast in Luke chapter 12 between treasures on earth and treasures in heaven, it might lead to a wrong conclusion if taken in isolation. In Luke 16:8-11 (Good News Translation) the Lord Jesus corrects our misconceptions:

. . . the people of this world are much more shrewd in handling their affairs than the people who belong to the light. . . . make friends for yourselves with worldly wealth, so that when it gives out, you will be welcomed in the eternal home. Whoever is faithful in small matters will be faithful in large ones; whoever is dishonest in small matters will be dishonest in large ones. If, then, you have not been faithful in handling worldly wealth, how can you be trusted with true wealth?

Use commonsense principles of handling money and creating worldly wealth. Be prudent and think long-term, If you’re not honest and dependable in handling worldly wealth, how can you be trusted with treasures laid up in heaven?

What defines your life? Are you rich toward God?


[1] Kristin M. Hall, “Country singer Merle Haggard: still on the road,” Associated Press, September 11, 2014. http://bigstory.ap.org/article/country-singer-merle-haggard-still-road

[2] Lynn Stuart Parramore, “Seven Most Loathsome Commencement Speeches, Salon.com, May 31, 2013.

[3] Ayn Rand, Anthem, 1938 Part Eleven, http://www.pagebypagebooks.com/Ayn_Rand/Anthem/Part_Eleven_p1.html and
http://www.pagebypagebooks.com/Ayn_Rand/Anthem/Part_Eleven_p2.html

[4] Edward S. Little II, “Any Rand Led me to Christ,” Christianity Today, June 2011, Vol. 55, No. 6, Pg 50. http://www.christianitytoday.com/ct/2011/june/aynrandled.html

[5] Ibid.

[6] Ibid.

Friday, September 12, 2014

How should we then live?

• A basin of water and a towel tell the story.

Have you ever asked, “How should I live my life?”

Tonight at a Chinese restaurant, my daughter opened a fortune cookie that had this message: “We never know the worth of water till the well is dry.” Actually, as well, we will never know the spiritual significance of water until we consider certain key teachings of the Gospel.

      1. Water shows: What is God like?
      2. Water shows: Who is Jesus Christ?
      3. Water shows: What must I do now?
      4. Water shows: How should I live my life?

This time we explore the last essential of water from the Gospel According to John.

In John chapter 13, Jesus the Messiah has reached the point of mission critical. He, the sacrificial Passover Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world (Jn 1:29), has now come to the festival of the Passover in Jerusalem to be offered up for sin. He whose hour had not yet come at the wedding in Cana of Galilee (Jn 2:4) – for him the hour has now come. For him whose body is the temple (visible presence) of God, that “temple” will now be destroyed, but he will raise it up in three days (Jn 2:19). As Moses lifted up the bronze serpent on a pole in the wilderness, so must now Jesus – the Son of Man who descended from heaven – be lifted up upon a cross, that whoever believes in him may have eternal life (Jn 3:13-17).

With a double entendre on his last three words, John the Beloved Disciple, says in verse one: “Now before the Feast of the Passover, when Jesus knew that his hour had come to depart out of this world to the Father, having loved his own who were in the world, he loved them to the end [or “utmost”].” He loved them “to the end” – his death on the cross. And yet, because of the resurrection, there was no end to his love. There is a circle of never ending love. He loves his own to the utmost, everlastingly.

In 1923 Frederick Martin Lehman contemplated this amazing love of God the Son, and then penned a hymn, “The Love of God.” In stanza three he simply stands there in awe:
     
      Could we with ink the ocean fill,
      And were the skies of parchment made;
      Were every stalk on earth a quill,
      And every man a scribe by trade;
      To write the love of God above
      Would drain the ocean dry;
      Nor could the scroll contain the whole,
      Though stretched from sky to sky.

As a literary unit, John 13 is structured like three steps down and three steps up (called a chiasm) [1]:

      Prologue (13:1-5)
      A – Dialogue with Peter (13:6-11)                   A1 – Dialogue with Peter (13:36-28)
         B – “I give you an example” 13:12-15)     B1 – “I give you a new commandment” (13:31-35)
            C – The betrayer (13:16-20)            C1 – The betrayer (13:21-30)
     
This three-fold structure conveys three critical ideas to us.


• Water reveals the most important bath ever (John 13:10).

The story that is about to unfold blends together two uses of water: the religious and the practical. “Now the Passover of the Jews was at hand, and many went up from the country to Jerusalem before the Passover to purify themselves” (Jn 11:55). The temple courts provided many pools of water for ritual cleansing. But also, in this culture where you walked in sandals on dusty roads, foot washing was performed in domestic settings for personal hygiene and comfort (2 Sam 11:8; Song 5:3) and in domestic settings devoted to hospitality (Gen 18:4: Luke 7:44).

Jesus and the disciples were seated at the table for a meal together before the Passover – the last supper before Jesus was arrested, scourged, and crucified. Jesus, Lord and teacher, stood up from the table, laid aside his outer garments, took a towel and tied it around his waist. To the surprise and shock of the disciples, he poured water into a basin, began to wash the disciples’ feet and wipe them with the towel wrapped around him. Washing people’s feet was a task reserved for people of low estate or for Gentile slaves. So when Jesus got to Peter, an interesting dialogue ensued between Peter (P) and Jesus (J), verses 6-11.

P:   “Lord, do you wash my feet?”
J:    “What I am doing you do not understand now, but afterward you will understand.”
P:   “You shall never wash my feet.”
J:    “If I do not wash you, you have no share with me.”
P:   “Lord, not my feet only but also my hands and my head!”
J:    “The one who has bathed does not need to wash, except for his feet, but is completely clean. And you (plural) are clean, but not every one of you.”
Apostle John: For he knew who was to betray him; that was why he said, “Not all of you are clean.”

Finally, Jesus put on (literally “took up”) his outer clothes (v 12). To see the symbolism, it is important to remember that this is now Jesus’ “hour” (v 1). As Jesus had told his disciples, “The hour has come for the Son of Man to be glorified. Truly, truly, I say to you, unless a grain of wheat falls into the earth and dies, it remains alone; but if it dies, it bears much fruit” (Jn 12:23-24). The foot washing deliberately and solemnly recalls the teaching about Jesus being the Good Shepherd [2]. As Jesus “lays aside” his outer clothes for foot washing (Jn 13:4), so Jesus the Good Shepherd “lays aside” his life for his sheep (Jn 10:11,15,17,18). As Jesus “takes up” his outer garments again after foot washing (Jn 13:12), so Jesus the Good Shepherd “takes up” his life again (Jn 10:17). His self-giving love causes him to die as the Lamb of God for the sins of the world. His self-giving love causes him to resurrect himself as the living Savior of the world. “For God so loved the world that he gave his only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life” (Jn 3:16).

Jesus has just solemnly proclaimed, “If I do not wash you, you have no share with me” (v 8). The “water” is his death for sin and his rising to newness of life. He must die and rise again, not the people. He must apply this water by washing people. They cannot do it themselves. To receive this gift of being washed, the disciple must trust in this Good Shepherd, join the fold of God, and follow the Shepherd. This bath of washing which Jesus gives takes place once for all in an individual’s life. The washing of the feet takes place frequently.

Have you been washed in the bath water that Jesus Christ provides? Do you have a part in eternal life? Or, by your neglect or outright refusal, are you in the other group? “Whoever believes in the Son has eternal life; whoever does not obey the Son shall not see life, but the wrath of God remains on him” (Jn 3:36).


• Water reveals the greatest danger ever (John 13:8).

To Peter, the Lord Jesus had said, “And you (plural) are clean, but not every one of you” (v 10). Judas Iscariot, the unclean one, had presumably been baptized as a disciple of Christ (Jn 3:22; 4:2). He had shared the common life with Jesus and the other key disciples. At the last supper, he had shared a morsel (Jn 13:26), which later Christians would have seen as a parallel to participating in the Lord’s Supper, Holy Communion. And yet he had an evil heart of unbelief to which Satan could enter (Jn 13:27). And Judas betrayed Jesus to the authorities, fulfilling the Old Testament Scripture which said, “He who ate my bread has lifted his heel against me” (Jn 13:18).

When Jesus and his other disciples left the upper room where they had the supper, they went to the Garden of Gethsemane across from the brook Kidron. There Judas (who had left early), having procured a band of soldiers and some officers from the chief priests and the Pharisees (who were carrying lanterns and torches and weapons), found Jesus and arrested him. Judas rejected any participation in the bath of Christ’s death for sins and resurrection unto life. He was washed with physical water but never with spiritual water. Here is the greatest of dangers: knowing that Jesus is the way to eternal life and either neglecting him or rejecting him, and thereby perishing in darkness away from God – who is life – forevermore.

There is a second danger. Those like Peter who have had the spiritual bath can fail miserably and need restoration. Jesus had instructed him, “The one who has bathed does not need to wash, except for his feet” (Jn 13:10). Peter needed the washing of the feet – that cleansing from sin and that spiritual empowerment which Jesus supplies daily after the one-time bath. A little later in that same evening, Jesus taught this same principle using a different metaphor (Jn 15:1-11):

I am the true vine . . . Already you are clean because of the word that I have spoken to you. Abide in me, and I in you. As the branch cannot bear fruit by itself, unless it abides in the vine, neither can you, unless you abide in me. I am the vine; you are the branches. Whoever abides in me and I in him, he it is that bears much fruit, for apart from me you can do nothing. . . . By this my Father is glorified, that you bear much fruit and so prove to be my disciples. As the Father has loved me, so have I loved you. Abide in my love. If you keep my commandments, you will abide in my love, just as I have kept my Father's commandments and abide in his love. These things I have spoken to you, that my joy may be in you, and that your joy may be full. This is my commandment, that you love one another as I have loved you.

After the bath we must pay attention to the Word of Christ – the message of the Old Testament Scriptures centered on Christ and the message of the writings of the apostles (the New Testament). We must depend on Christ. We must pray. We must obey the commandments of Christ, especially the command to love one another as he has loved us. If we cease this daily washing and spiritual empowerment, we can become like Peter. That night after the last supper, Peter denied knowing Jesus three times before a rooster crowed alerting people to the morning. After the resurrection, on the shore of Lake Tiberias, the Lord Jesus restored Peter to active service in the kingdom of God.

Have you undergone the bath from the Lord Jesus but are tempted to live life on your own sometimes? Remember, Christ is the vine and we are the branches. Only by that daily washing of the feet and that daily abiding of the branch in union with the vine – only then can we stay useful and joyful in our earthly pilgrimage.


• Water reveals the most important example ever (John 13:15).

If we have been washed in the once-for-all bath that Jesus gives, how should we live thereafter? Jesus tells us, “If I then, your Lord and Teacher, have washed your feet, you also ought to wash one another's feet. For I have given you an example, that you also should do just as I have done to you (Jn 13:14-15). As we read this literary unit of the Gospel, we are walking down the literary steps, so to speak. As we walk back up the literary steps, Jesus says it again in a broader way, “Now is the Son of Man glorified, and God is glorified in him. . . . A new commandment I give to you, that you love one another: just as I have loved you, you also are to love one another. By this all people will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another” (Jn 13:31,34,35).

How does humble, welcoming service (“foot washing”) and the new commandment of love (“love as I have loved”) work out in real life? Let me give an extended example based on a research article [3]. No follower of Christ is flawless, but we are candles in the darkness and this is how one man shines his light.

Adriaan J. Vlok (born December 11, 1937), grew up in a rural region of South Africa. Unable to afford college, he got a job as a filing clerk in the Department of Justice for the Afrikaner National Party government, which was beginning to standardize South Africa’s systems of formal and informal racial segregation into the strict legal framework called apartheid. Rising through the ranks, he became the Minister of Law and Order in South Africa from 1986 to 1991 in the final years of the apartheid era, which ended in 1994.

To appear humane and yet crush black opponents, Adriaan Vlok had his department engage in clandestine tactics of horrible violence. For example, the department formed a secret “counterinsurgency unit” at a farm called Vlakplaas. This unit with the good-sounding name kidnapped, drugged, and murdered anti-apartheid fighters, and then burned their bodies on a barbecue pit. On one occasion this unit caused the disappearance of a whole group of youth activists by packing them into a bus laden with explosives and pushing it off a cliff.

They developed a plan to assassinate Reverend Frank Chikane, a preacher and the peaceful head of an interdenominational Christian group. Why did the unit plot against this peaceful man? The apartheid government believed that his group was harboring armed anti-apartheid militants in its Johannesburg headquarters. What are you going to do to the leader of an outfit like that except to neutralize him?

So in 1989, a pair of Vlok’s policemen broke into Chikane’s suitcase at the Johannesburg airport, where he’d checked it for a trip to Namibia, and laced his underpants with paraoxon, a potent insecticide. As a result, Chikane got so sick that he had to be flown to the United States for advanced medical treatment. Fortunately, he didn’t die. And after South Africa’s transition to a multiracial democracy in 1994, he went on to serve South Africa’s second black president.

As part of the transition to democratic rule in 1994, a Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC) was formed. People – black and white – who had committed crimes against human rights under apartheid were invited to testify. The TRC granted amnesty to most perpetrators such as Vlok, except for a few notorious killers like Eugene de Kock, the primary Vlakplaas assassin. Vlok visited this assassin in prison. Intending to seek his forgiveness, Vlok instead gave into a different urge: the urge to defend himself. “Eugene!” he cried out. “Did I ever tell you to kill somebody?” “No,” de Kock replied. “But you gave me a medal when I killed them.”

Thus, there has been a battle within Adriaan Vlok’s soul: between making excuses and following the path of redemption, truth, forgiveness and reconciliation. It has been a long way, but he is on the right path. The first steps began with a government-sponsored tour of Taiwan in the 1980’s. The Taiwanese took his delegation to a museum that showcased 5,000 years of Han Chinese political, intellectual, and artistic achievements. Yet, back home in South Africa, Chinese immigrants were classified as “colored,” making them second-class citizens, compared to whites. Standing before display cases of delicate Chinese pottery, the folly of apartheid struck him. “I saw then, ‘There must be something wrong. Not with them, but with us.’”

His wife, plagued with depression, became much worse after he retired from public life in 1994. She finally took a pistol and ended her life. Vlok felt devastated. A couple of weeks later a man delivered a card to his home. It said, “In remembrance of Corrie, we have placed a thousand books of New Testaments and psalms.” The man was from the Gideons International, the group which distributes millions of Bibles a year to public spaces.

Incredibly moved by the gesture, he accepted their invitation to a dinner meeting. They asked, “Do you want to join us?” South Africa’s Truth and Reconciliation Commission had just informed him it would call him up to testify about his time as police chief. So he declined the invitation to join the Gideons. In Vlok’s words: “I said, ‘I have got a bad history. Horrible stories will come out!’ And they said, ‘Look at the Bible. Moses killed a person, and the Lord used him. David committed adultery, and he killed people, and the Lord used him. Do you still say no?’ So I joined them.”

Adopting the Gideons’ regiment of reading the Bible twice daily (the Old Testament in the morning and the New Testament in the evening), he came to have a deep, living faith in Christ as his Lord and Savior, Christ who died for our sins and rose victoriously from the grave. One particular passage from the Gospel of Matthew gripped him and wouldn’t let him go: “If you are presenting a sacrifice at the altar in the Temple,” Jesus said in the Sermon on the Mount, “and you suddenly remember that someone has something against you, leave your sacrifice there at the altar. Go and be reconciled to that person. Only then come and offer your sacrifice to God.”

“I realized,” Vlok said, “I had to start making peace with my brother whom I had hurt.” He adopted an unusual method: taking the role of a servant, washing the feet of black people whom he had harmed, and saying, “I have sinned against the Lord and against you. Will you forgive me?” The author of the article which I referenced earlier interviewed Adriaan Vlok in his house. He had opened to the passage from Matthew and read it. She said:

My eyes drifted just above the text. I saw there was another line to the passage, one Vlok hadn’t quoted me. “You must not murder. If you commit murder, you are subject to judgment.” I asked him if he was afraid of judgment. “After I die, yes, yes, the Lord will sit in judgment,” he muttered. “But Jesus will be there next to me. If anyone accuses me, He will say: ‘But I already paid the price.’ ”

How shall we live after receiving our bath from Christ? By being like him – living a life of humble, welcoming service (symbolically represented by the foot washing in the upper room at the Last Supper), by paying attention to the Word of Christ (the message of the Holy Scriptures of the Old and New Testaments), and by loving one another as Christ has loved us.

[1] Mary L. Coloe, “Welcome into the Household of God: The Foot Washing in John 13,” CBQ 66, 2004, pp 400-415.

[2] Ibid. p 407.

[3] Eve Fairbanks, “I Have Sinned Against the Lord and Against You! Will You Forgive Me?”
New Republic, June 18, 2014. http://www.newrepublic.com/article/118135/adriaan-vlok-ex-apartheid-leader-washes-feet-and-seeks-redemption